A Comparative Evaluation of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for Sustainable Transport
نویسندگان
چکیده
The article pertains to the utilization of application potential MCDM/MCDA (Multi-Criteria Decision Making/Multi-Criteria Analysis) methods in decision-making problems field transport light sustainable development. consists a theoretical and an empirical part. As part literature studies, review was carried out on latest applications for transport. In part, multi-criteria analysis placement selection strip expressway located north-eastern Poland out. For this purpose, hybrid approach used, consisting three selected methods: DEMATEL, REMBRANDT, VIKOR. ranking compared with results achieved EIA report investment were obtained by using different set that proposed first research, i.e., AHP, Fuzzy TOPSIS, PROMETHEE. performed analyses allowed eventual multi-dimensional evaluation most popular currently applied
منابع مشابه
A Review of Spatial Multi Criteria Analysis (SMCA) Methods for Sustainable Land Use Planning (SLUP)
Despite increasing necessity for considering sustainability traits in any use to which land is put as well as the proliferation of numerous decision support tools, there is a lack of appropriate guidance for decision-makers on the selection of appropriate method among these decision support tools. This study reviews existing literature on state of the art on Spatial Muilti Criteria Analysis (SM...
متن کاملGeneric Methods for Multi-criteria Evaluation
When evaluating data mining algorithms that are applied to solve real-world problems there are often several, conflicting criteria that need to be considered. We investigate the concept of generic multi-criteria (MC) classifier and algorithm evaluation and perform a comparison of existing methods. This comparison makes explicit some of the important characteristics of MC analysis and focuses on...
متن کاملa comparative pragmatic analysis of the speech act of “disagreement” across english and persian
the speech act of disagreement has been one of the speech acts that has received the least attention in the field of pragmatics. this study investigates the ways power relations, social distance, formality of the context, gender, and language proficiency (for efl learners) influence disagreement and politeness strategies. the participants of the study were 200 male and female native persian s...
15 صفحه اولComparative Analysis of Multi-criteria Evaluation of Sustainable Supplier Selection Problem Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets
The sustainable supplier selection process requires consideration of multi-criteria evaluations. In recent years, to prevent the hesitation of different linguistic expressions by the decision makers, and to help the selection of the best one as the solution of different alternatives, researchers have been using several methods such as hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTS), hesitant fuzzy ...
متن کاملUsing Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Evaluation the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Indicators
This paper offered a procedure for ranking the entrepreneurial and innovative indicators using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), taking into account three individual,organizational and cultural dimensions simultaneously in decision making procedure. Henceforward, by using the Meta synthesis framework, the form of group classification of indicators from afinding’s combination was suggested ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Energies
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1996-1073']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165100